查看完整版本 : 「转载」耶穌是非歷史人物

鋒利超人 2019-1-22 01:58 AM

「转载」耶穌是非歷史人物

[size=4]N多不同年代的学者,有知識背景,轉向研究耶穌的歷史性,
唔通会唔叻过果d单憑上载一两張耶鲁書截图的自稱二打六咩?
如果比你揀,你会揀信真学者或信自稱果啲?[/size]
[size=4]
「转载」
George Albert Wells,通常被稱為GA Wells,
是倫敦大學Birkbeck的德語教授。
在寫了關於歐洲著名知識分子的書籍後,例如約翰·戈特弗里德赫爾德和弗蘭茲· 格里斯帕爾澤,
他轉向研究耶穌的歷史性,從他的著作“早期基督徒的耶穌”開始於1971年。
他最為人所知的是論證耶穌本質上是一個神話而非歷史人物!
韋爾斯的基本觀察是,建議最早出現的第一世紀基督教文獻,最值得注意的是保羅和其他一些作家的新約書信,對耶穌作為傳教士和奇蹟工作者的福音形象表示不熟悉。最近幾十年生活和死亡。相反,早期的基督教書信將他“作為一個基本上超自然的人物,在過去某個未指明的時期,在地球上只是模糊不清”。
威爾斯認為,這些最早的基督徒的耶穌不是建立在一個歷史人物的基礎上,而是一個純粹的神話,源於基於猶太智慧人物的神秘猜測。
G. A. Wells, was a Professor of German at Birkbeck, University of London. After writing books about famous European intellectuals, such as Johann Gottfried Herder and Franz Grillparzer, he turned to the study of the historicity of Jesus, starting with his book The Jesus of the Early Christians in 1971.[3] He is best known as an advocate of the thesis that Jesus is essentially a mythical rather than a historical figure.Wells's fundamental observation is to suggest that the earliest extant Christian documents from the first century, most notably the New Testament epistles by Paul and some other writers, show no familiarity with the gospel figure of Jesus as a preacher and miracle-worker who lived and died in the recent decades. Rather, the early Christian epistles present him "as a basically supernatural personage only obscurely on Earth as a man at some unspecified period in the past". Wells believed that the Jesus of these earliest Christians was not based on a historical character, but a pure myth, derived from mystical speculations based on the Jewish Wisdom figure.[/size]

lrr174 2019-1-22 02:17 PM

唔好信o羅, 亦冇人逼你信
頁: [1]
查看完整版本: 「转载」耶穌是非歷史人物